|
The Field Report
Page 2
EXPOSING THE DIRT DOCTOR
The ROSE
WELCOME TO THE FIELD REPORT
. . . wherein I try to provide
current and useful information about gardening in alkaline clay soils,
with special emphasis on the selection, care, and cultivation of roses.
Also included is a short list of roses specifically recommended for
Texas gardens. On the Rose Rosette page, in addition to a discussion of
that dreadful disease and its remedies, you will find photographs of
typical symptoms and of the eriophyid mite believed to be responsible
for transmitting it.
For anyone interested in organic gardening, I include
information regarding the proven, common-sense practice of that worthy
endeavor. Unhappily, though, not all sources for this kind of
information adhere to scientific principles and practices or even to
fundamental rules of professional ethics. And there are a few outright
charlatans flinging around a lot of nonsense (or worse) in the name of
organic gardening, which often makes it difficult for the average
gardener to separate the wheat from the chaff. So, heeding the words of
Dr. Marianne Jennings, who once said,
"Truth is
violated by falsehood but outraged by silence,"
I devote the second portion of this website to
informing the visitor about our local source of chaff -- and to the
curious and often ludicrous pronouncements of Dallas’ own mountebank of
misinformation, John Howard Garrett, the self-anointed and self-serving
"Doctor of Dirt."
Field Roebuck
For Roses and
Gardening:
Who am
I?/Rose
Care/Rose
Pruning/Rose
Rosette/Clay
Soil/Recommended
Roses
Exposing the Dirt
Doctor:
Who is
he?/Diatomaceous
Earth/Lava
Sand/Rock
Powders/Misinformation/Phil
Callahan/Howard's
Garden
(Site last updated on April 6, 2006)
(Contributions to help
offset the annual cost of providing this website will be graciously
accepted and appreciated. Mail them to 6960 Joyce Way, Dallas, Texas
75225. Thank you.)
Note: The rose pictured
at the top of this page is 'Better Times,' a once-popular 1934 hybrid
tea, which the American Rose Society has dropped from its annual
Handbook for Selecting Roses because of an "inferior" rating. It
was listed in the 1996 ARS handbook, where it had a rating of 5.2,
meaning "of questionable value."
I planted this rose in April, 1959, and
that same plant is still there today, blooming beautifully -- and almost
continuously. In fact, I took this photo of a flower on that original,
40-year-old rosebush on March 31, 1999. This should tell you something
about the usefulness of the ARS ratings system.
AUTHORED BY
FIELD ROEBUCK
http://froebuck.home.texas.net/index.htm
EXPOSING THE DIRT DOCTOR
!
PAGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|